冲刺2008高考英语模拟试题 (十四) 下 (含答案)

点击数:

                                  C
    We all hate speed cameras, don’t we? They’re not there to slow drivers down and lower the road accidents; they just make money for the government. They trick us, cost us cold hard cash, disturb us from driving properly and are unfair.
    Well, here’s a surprising thing: what if there were facts that the boring cameras actually saved lives? It’s a conclusion difficult to ignore when you look at what’s happening in France, a country with a historically poor record of road safety.
There were 16617 road deaths in 1972 in France, for example, but that dropped to 8412 by 1995 following rules such as compulsory seat belt wearing in 1990 and a lowering of the blood alcohol limit to 0.05 in 1995.
    Last year, the road deaths dropped below 5000 for the first time, or 4.9 percent less than 2004, comparing road deaths to population in 2005, that’s about 817 per million people compared with Australia’s 806.
    And guess what? Last year the number of speed cameras on French roads reached 1000 and the government plans to double that within the next three years.
    Okay, you know the arguments regarding increased traffic safety and cameras-for-income, but it seems in France there’s been a major cultural change brought on by radars and other laws. A three-hour, wine-soaked lunch with a quick rush back to the office is no longer on.

总页数: 9
    1 [2] [3] [4] [5下一页 尾页

打印预览】 【大字 中字 小字】 【我要评论】【返回顶部
         
发表评论         最新评论内容          发表时间
精品课程
频道精选
论坛热帖

南京厚建软件 LivCMS 内容管理系统http://www.hogesoft.com 授权用户:http://www.ewstudy.com